next up previous contents
Next: About this document Up: No Title Previous: Verifying the results of

de Broglie Hypothesis (25 pts)

In lecture, we considered the correspondence between particles moving in free space according to an energy function E(p) and wave-packets propagating under a dispersion relation given by tex2html_wrap_inline301 and tex2html_wrap_inline303 . In this problem you will consider the same correspondence but for a particle in a system with potential energy.

Consider a particle whose energy is given by

equation115

Written this way, as a function of the momentum p, the energy function of the particle has a special name. It is known as the ``Hamiltonian,'' and so we call the energy here ``H'' instead of the more familiar ``E''.

Imagine that an external force tex2html_wrap_inline307 is applied to the particle in this system in such a way that the momentum of the particle as a function of time is given by p(t).

a) Determine tex2html_wrap_inline311 in terms of the force acting on the particle tex2html_wrap_inline307 , the position of the particle x(t) and a derivative of the potential function V(x). (Note that this amounts to applying the concept of conservation of momentum.)

b) (briefly) why tex2html_wrap_inline319 . Thus, show that

  equation131

Is this relation true even when the external force is zero?

c) Show that when the external force is zero we also have

  equation137

Eq. (2) and Eq. (3) taken together are known as the canonical equations of Hamilton, which you studied in detail in 8.033/8.21.

d) Now consider a wave-packet description of the same particle. If the wavelength of the waves are much smaller than the scales over which V(x) varies, near each point tex2html_wrap_inline323 in space, waves of a given frequency tex2html_wrap_inline325 , will appear with nearly constant wave lengths so that we may define for these waves a local wave number tex2html_wrap_inline327 , which will depend on the region of space tex2html_wrap_inline323 at which we are making the observations and the frequency of the wave. (Note that the function tex2html_wrap_inline327 may be inverted for each tex2html_wrap_inline323 to find a local (spatially dependent) version of the usual dispersion relation, tex2html_wrap_inline335 .

Using the method of stationary phase, , in terms of tex2html_wrap_inline337 , the velocity of the following wave packet

displaymath339

for points x near tex2html_wrap_inline323 . ( tex2html_wrap_inline345 is sharply peaked near a frequency tex2html_wrap_inline347 such that tex2html_wrap_inline349 .)

e) For motion of the particle in the wave-packet description to be consistent with the motion determined in the particle description (Eq. (2)), what must be the form for tex2html_wrap_inline351 in terms of V(x) and k, if we accept the identification tex2html_wrap_inline357 ?

Show again that we must therefore have the same correspondence as in class, tex2html_wrap_inline359 .

f) Figure 1 shows the path of an electron passing though JJ Thomson's apparatus with the electric field turned off and the magnetic field turned on. What local dispersion relation tex2html_wrap_inline361 for waves between the plates would be needed to make a wave-packet follow the same trajectory? (Be sure to this one over with your recitation instructor if you do not understand what this problem is getting at.)

Hints: The energy of an electron in the constant magnetic field B shown in the picture is

displaymath365

and the Hamiltonian for an electron in the same magnetic field is

displaymath367

where

displaymath369

   figure161
Figure 1: Electron moving through a magnetic field


next up previous contents
Next: About this document Up: No Title Previous: Verifying the results of

Prof. Tomas Alberto Arias
Thu Feb 13 14:11:24 EST 1997