next up previous
Next: About this document Up: No Title Previous: Verifying the results

de Broglie Hypothesis

In lecture, we considered the correspondence between particles moving in free space according to an energy function and wave-packets propagating under a dispersion relation given by and . In this problem you will consider the same correspondence but for a particle in a system with potential energy.

Consider a particle whose energy is given by

Written this way, as a function of the momentum p, the energy function of the particle has a special name. It is known as the ``Hamiltonian,'' and so we call the energy here ``H'' instead of the more familiar ``E''.

Imagine that an external force is applied to this particle in this system in such a way that the momentum of the particle as a function of time is given by .

a) Use conservation of momentum to determine in terms of the force acting on the particle , the position of the particle and the potential function .

b) Use conservation of energy to balance the change in energy H of the particle against the rate at which the external force does work , where . Show that

 

Is this relation true even when the external force is zero?

c) Show that when the external force is zero we also have,

 

Eq. (2) and Eq. (3) taken together are known as the canonical equations of Hamilton, and are studied in detail in 8.033/8.06.

d) Now consider a wave-packet description of the same particle. So long as the wavelength of the waves are much smaller than the scales over which varies, we can imagine a very localized wave-packet in place of our particle. Around each location in space x where the packet can be centered, there then can be a different local dispersion relation . Given the function , what velocity we would associate with a wave-packet centered about wave number and position ?

e) For motion of the particle in the wave-packet description to be consistent with the motion determined in the particle description (Eq.'s (2-3)), what must be the form for in terms of and k? Show that we have again the same correspondence as in class, and

f) What local dispersion relation would you need to make a wave-packet accelerate just like a particle subjected to a constant force?



next up previous
Next: About this document Up: No Title Previous: Verifying the results



Prof. Tomas Alberto Arias
Mon Feb 26 14:52:38 EST 1996