To write this result down directly using the complex representation,
we consider the motion at each point relative to the
motion associated with the incoming wave at point
,
which from our previous discussion we know to be
for some
complex amplitude
. We
expect two waves contribute to the motion at each point
, the
incoming wave and the reflected wave. (See
Figure 1.) By the principle of superposition, the
final motion will be the sum each of these.
The motion due to the incoming wave at point , a distance
from the point
, will include an additional propagation
factor of
. The first contribution to the motion
at
is thus
![]() |
The second contribution comes from the reflected wave. To compute
this contribution at point , we make a number of relative
comparisons. First, we compare the motion of the incoming wave at
to the motion of the same wave at the interface,
. The distance
propagated is now
, and so we must include a factor of
to find the motion of the incoming wave at
.
Next, we know that the motion of the reflected wave at
the interface matches the motion of the incoming wave at the
interface, except for the reflection amplitude factor
. Thus, the motion of the reflected wave at
is just the
motion of the reference point times two correction factors,
and
. Finally, relative to the motion of the reflected wave at
,
the motion induced by the reflected wave at
,
must contain one
final propagation factor
. Thus, the reflected
wave contribution to the motion at
is